GRIEF MADE IN AMERICA IS NOT "GOOD GRIEF" By Carolyn Baker
This morning as I was gathering news for Truth to Power's Daily News Digest, I opened Sharon Astyk's blogspot, one of my very favorite, to find her caustic commentary on the death and funeral of Michael Jackson. As her comments distilled in my mind and body, I realized that I have even more to say about this cultural phenomenon-no desire to say it better than Sharon because who could (?), but hopefully to embellish her inimitable incisiveness.
Now before proceeding, I ask the reader to refrain from any temptation to distort my comments by calling them racist. What this white lady is addressing has nothing to do with race, particularly in a week when I have stated in the Daily News Digest that I refused to pay any attention to the deranged antics of Sarah Palin as long as Cynthia McKinney was incarcerated. So woopeee, now that Cynthia is free, I can dump on Sarah as much as I like.
Like Sharon, I have chosen to ignore, or at least avoid, all coverage of the death and funeral of Jackson for the same reasons as Sharon has: "I think that the only reasonable response to the death of Michael Jackson is ‘that's something of a relief' since pedophiles rarely cease molesting others." Besides making no bones about her distaste for his vapid music, Sharon is struggling to access the core of the outpouring of "grief" around Jackson's death. One conclusion she draws is that "The explanation is this - we love grief itself. It is so much fun to feel bad, to mourn, to grieve."
Yet Sharon is in no way putting down the importance of grief. Even though she would roll her New York eyes at the thought of most things touchy-feely, especially as she recently wrote, anything that involves standing or sitting in a circle, and even though her East Coast perspective is much more pragmatic and less psychological, Sharon has touched on something that in my opinion, (perhaps because I've lived on both coasts) is exceedingly important to notice. That something, and Sharon addresses it, is the authentic expression of grief.
Thank you Sharon for mentioning all the things we aren't allowed to grieve in this culture: The extinction of 200 species per day, oceanic dead zones the size of countries, epidemic incidences of environmentally-related illnesses like cancer that are taking people out in ghastly numbers-I don't think I need to keep going down this road; we are all too familiar with it.
So what more can I say about grief and our aversion to grieving about things that really matter that Sharon hasn't said?
Taking a different approach, I'd like to pursue the topic, and I'm certain she would welcome my following some very important threads that shed light on the difference between authentic funerals and pseudo-funerals. I hasten to add that on one level, Jackson's funeral was authentic. A real human being died, and real human beings showed up to pay their respects and eulogize him. However, our indigenous ancestors had a dramatically different perspective on death and loss, and it has everything to do with the current moment.
Many readers of this article are deeply involved with the worldwide Transition Town network which has literally gone viral around the globe as individuals and communities prepare for life in a post-petroleum world. For me, it is extremely rewarding to witness the diversity of perspectives in the Transition movement and the dialog that results from it. Some people believe that we can seamlessly tiptoe into Transition without a great deal of adversity, while others, such as myself, believe that adversity must be part of, not eliminated from, the Transition.
Three fundamental underpinnings of Transition are: head, heart, and hands, meaning that in order to make the most efficient and least distressing transition to a post-industrial world, we must fortify our heads with knowledge of real-world conditions; we must prepare emotionally and spiritually for transition, and we must learn new/old skills which will facilitate survival in a powered-down, economically depleted world.
Recently, Rob Hopkins, founder of the worldwide Transition Town network responded to some of Sharon's concerns about the movement, some of which relate to the so-called "heart and soul" aspects of the Transition movement. The dialog between Sharon and Rob is not only a rich read, but absolutely necessary to ponder for anyone who is collapse-aware. (See Sharon's comments: Part I and Part II and Rob's comments) Both perspectives are necessary and must be held in tandem in the transition from the world as we have known it to the one we are entering.
Rob clearly validates Sharon's concerns regarding a pre-occupation with heart and soul, but makes a powerful assertion:
If we think that we are going to weather the Long Emergency without any form of supporting each other emotionally, without any kind of ability to share the distress it is causing, if we think that the work of the next 10-20 years will be purely external, we are deluding ourselves.
Now while my intention in this article is not to analyze the dialog between Sharon and Rob, I feel it's necessary to notice Sharon's concern's about over-emphasis on heart and soul and the minimizing of real work in the world to create the safest, most humane transition-and to notice that her comments on authentic grieving, in fact, support the above statement by Rob and reveal that she is indeed making space in her perspective for "inner work."
The work of heart and soul shows up differently for everyone, but in my opinion, grief is at the core of the fine-tuning in which we must engage emotionally in transition. I do not for one moment believe that we can seamlessly tiptoe through the tulips of transition to a just, humane, sustainable world. There will be adversity, and to quote a recent Hollywood blockbuster having to do with petroleum, "there will be blood."
So then, what is it about grief that we should notice, beyond the fact that it is fundamental in heart and soul preparation?
First, I believe that once again, we must acknowledge the perspective on grief held by our indigenous ancestors. It was inextricably connected to their sense of meaning and purpose, which in fact, informed their grief and caused them to express it in the most authentic manner. That is to say that the idea of addressing a problem by first strategizing a solution is a relatively modern idea. When a dilemma first appeared to the ancients, they did not immediately set out to fix it, but to make sense of it-to understand why it was showing up at that particular moment and for what purpose. They understood that if they did not grasp these fundamental realities, their attempts at solution would be fatally flawed. Naturally, they desired to solve their problems, but not before reflecting deeply on them.
For them, grief was a pivotal process for making sense of the losses that they encountered. Some losses could be adapted to, some not, but all losses, they believed must be grieved.
In the Dagara tribe of West Africa, the funeral is a central and commonplace ritual. The Dagara believe that the world of the living and the world of the dead are inextricably connected and that we are the living-living whereas people in the other world are the living-dead. Their cosmology teaches that while the two worlds are separate, both are connected and that most of human experience is about loss, punctuated by moments of joy and deep, intimate community. The funeral, and the grieving process that attends it, is for the Dagara, an opportunity for profound connection with each other and with the other world which they believe provides the deeper wisdom required for navigating this one. From their perspective, grief is not only food for the soul but evaporates the barriers that stand in the way of living humanely, compassionately, and in harmony with the human and more-than-human worlds.
As I read Sharon Astyk's comments about the pseudo-funeral of Michael Jackson, I am in awe of her observation:
Anything so that we don't have to think about the world as it actually is. Anything to wipe the death of all green shoots off the page. Anything to harken back to less important questions than whether your kids have a future, how hot the planet will get, how poor you will be. Anything to give us outlet for our emotions so that they may be expelled pointlessly on things that do not matter. Anything to let us feel passion for things that are totally harmless, conveniently distracting, and, bluntly, make us dumber just for being near them.
This is indeed, the American way of grief. First deny, then if you must acknowledge that there is a problem, set out to fix it as quickly and non-reflectively as possible. Sadly, this guarantees that your "solutions" will be misguided, superficial, and pathetically inept. For you see, if you really tap into your grief for the litany that Sharon is reciting here, you might feel overwhelmed, powerless, and hopeless. But because you don't get that in those very feelings lie the threads that can take you into the depths of your most profound humanity, your most exquisite sacred self, and therefore, the font of the most creative, visionary, innovative responses humanly and divinely possible, you risk missing the infinite opportunities that the collapse of civilization now presents us with, and you are therefore more likely to continue engaging in meaningless, pseudo-funerals.
As Sharon notes, "a great many things worth grieving over are truly dead, and we never even wept for them." The pseudo-funerals will continue, and as collapse exacerbates, they will most certainly proliferate. Our challenge, however, is to engage in authentic funerals of the moment and water our transitions with tears that clear our eyes and our minds to envision and establish a new paradigm.
Now before proceeding, I ask the reader to refrain from any temptation to distort my comments by calling them racist. What this white lady is addressing has nothing to do with race, particularly in a week when I have stated in the Daily News Digest that I refused to pay any attention to the deranged antics of Sarah Palin as long as Cynthia McKinney was incarcerated. So woopeee, now that Cynthia is free, I can dump on Sarah as much as I like.
Like Sharon, I have chosen to ignore, or at least avoid, all coverage of the death and funeral of Jackson for the same reasons as Sharon has: "I think that the only reasonable response to the death of Michael Jackson is ‘that's something of a relief' since pedophiles rarely cease molesting others." Besides making no bones about her distaste for his vapid music, Sharon is struggling to access the core of the outpouring of "grief" around Jackson's death. One conclusion she draws is that "The explanation is this - we love grief itself. It is so much fun to feel bad, to mourn, to grieve."
Yet Sharon is in no way putting down the importance of grief. Even though she would roll her New York eyes at the thought of most things touchy-feely, especially as she recently wrote, anything that involves standing or sitting in a circle, and even though her East Coast perspective is much more pragmatic and less psychological, Sharon has touched on something that in my opinion, (perhaps because I've lived on both coasts) is exceedingly important to notice. That something, and Sharon addresses it, is the authentic expression of grief.
Thank you Sharon for mentioning all the things we aren't allowed to grieve in this culture: The extinction of 200 species per day, oceanic dead zones the size of countries, epidemic incidences of environmentally-related illnesses like cancer that are taking people out in ghastly numbers-I don't think I need to keep going down this road; we are all too familiar with it.
So what more can I say about grief and our aversion to grieving about things that really matter that Sharon hasn't said?
Taking a different approach, I'd like to pursue the topic, and I'm certain she would welcome my following some very important threads that shed light on the difference between authentic funerals and pseudo-funerals. I hasten to add that on one level, Jackson's funeral was authentic. A real human being died, and real human beings showed up to pay their respects and eulogize him. However, our indigenous ancestors had a dramatically different perspective on death and loss, and it has everything to do with the current moment.
Many readers of this article are deeply involved with the worldwide Transition Town network which has literally gone viral around the globe as individuals and communities prepare for life in a post-petroleum world. For me, it is extremely rewarding to witness the diversity of perspectives in the Transition movement and the dialog that results from it. Some people believe that we can seamlessly tiptoe into Transition without a great deal of adversity, while others, such as myself, believe that adversity must be part of, not eliminated from, the Transition.
Three fundamental underpinnings of Transition are: head, heart, and hands, meaning that in order to make the most efficient and least distressing transition to a post-industrial world, we must fortify our heads with knowledge of real-world conditions; we must prepare emotionally and spiritually for transition, and we must learn new/old skills which will facilitate survival in a powered-down, economically depleted world.
Recently, Rob Hopkins, founder of the worldwide Transition Town network responded to some of Sharon's concerns about the movement, some of which relate to the so-called "heart and soul" aspects of the Transition movement. The dialog between Sharon and Rob is not only a rich read, but absolutely necessary to ponder for anyone who is collapse-aware. (See Sharon's comments: Part I and Part II and Rob's comments) Both perspectives are necessary and must be held in tandem in the transition from the world as we have known it to the one we are entering.
Rob clearly validates Sharon's concerns regarding a pre-occupation with heart and soul, but makes a powerful assertion:
If we think that we are going to weather the Long Emergency without any form of supporting each other emotionally, without any kind of ability to share the distress it is causing, if we think that the work of the next 10-20 years will be purely external, we are deluding ourselves.
Now while my intention in this article is not to analyze the dialog between Sharon and Rob, I feel it's necessary to notice Sharon's concern's about over-emphasis on heart and soul and the minimizing of real work in the world to create the safest, most humane transition-and to notice that her comments on authentic grieving, in fact, support the above statement by Rob and reveal that she is indeed making space in her perspective for "inner work."
The work of heart and soul shows up differently for everyone, but in my opinion, grief is at the core of the fine-tuning in which we must engage emotionally in transition. I do not for one moment believe that we can seamlessly tiptoe through the tulips of transition to a just, humane, sustainable world. There will be adversity, and to quote a recent Hollywood blockbuster having to do with petroleum, "there will be blood."
So then, what is it about grief that we should notice, beyond the fact that it is fundamental in heart and soul preparation?
First, I believe that once again, we must acknowledge the perspective on grief held by our indigenous ancestors. It was inextricably connected to their sense of meaning and purpose, which in fact, informed their grief and caused them to express it in the most authentic manner. That is to say that the idea of addressing a problem by first strategizing a solution is a relatively modern idea. When a dilemma first appeared to the ancients, they did not immediately set out to fix it, but to make sense of it-to understand why it was showing up at that particular moment and for what purpose. They understood that if they did not grasp these fundamental realities, their attempts at solution would be fatally flawed. Naturally, they desired to solve their problems, but not before reflecting deeply on them.
For them, grief was a pivotal process for making sense of the losses that they encountered. Some losses could be adapted to, some not, but all losses, they believed must be grieved.
In the Dagara tribe of West Africa, the funeral is a central and commonplace ritual. The Dagara believe that the world of the living and the world of the dead are inextricably connected and that we are the living-living whereas people in the other world are the living-dead. Their cosmology teaches that while the two worlds are separate, both are connected and that most of human experience is about loss, punctuated by moments of joy and deep, intimate community. The funeral, and the grieving process that attends it, is for the Dagara, an opportunity for profound connection with each other and with the other world which they believe provides the deeper wisdom required for navigating this one. From their perspective, grief is not only food for the soul but evaporates the barriers that stand in the way of living humanely, compassionately, and in harmony with the human and more-than-human worlds.
As I read Sharon Astyk's comments about the pseudo-funeral of Michael Jackson, I am in awe of her observation:
Anything so that we don't have to think about the world as it actually is. Anything to wipe the death of all green shoots off the page. Anything to harken back to less important questions than whether your kids have a future, how hot the planet will get, how poor you will be. Anything to give us outlet for our emotions so that they may be expelled pointlessly on things that do not matter. Anything to let us feel passion for things that are totally harmless, conveniently distracting, and, bluntly, make us dumber just for being near them.
This is indeed, the American way of grief. First deny, then if you must acknowledge that there is a problem, set out to fix it as quickly and non-reflectively as possible. Sadly, this guarantees that your "solutions" will be misguided, superficial, and pathetically inept. For you see, if you really tap into your grief for the litany that Sharon is reciting here, you might feel overwhelmed, powerless, and hopeless. But because you don't get that in those very feelings lie the threads that can take you into the depths of your most profound humanity, your most exquisite sacred self, and therefore, the font of the most creative, visionary, innovative responses humanly and divinely possible, you risk missing the infinite opportunities that the collapse of civilization now presents us with, and you are therefore more likely to continue engaging in meaningless, pseudo-funerals.
As Sharon notes, "a great many things worth grieving over are truly dead, and we never even wept for them." The pseudo-funerals will continue, and as collapse exacerbates, they will most certainly proliferate. Our challenge, however, is to engage in authentic funerals of the moment and water our transitions with tears that clear our eyes and our minds to envision and establish a new paradigm.
Tags: and, heart, indigenous, reskilling, soul, wisdom
Add a Comment
2 Comments
-
Comment by Carolyn Baker on July 13, 2009 at 8:32am - Hi Alex--I'm all for grieving and outpourings of compassion, but when do we start seeing elaborate funerals for common people--for the millions of people who die of hunger each year--nameless faces in far off lands? In the culture of empire, it's very difficult to sort out what is authentic grief, and what is media hype. Part of our work as transitioners is to reclaim authentic grief for all of the earth community and for what empire has taken from us on every level.--Carolyn
-
Comment by Alex Prescott on July 8, 2009 at 11:01pm -
i agree with much of what you say, thanks for this. however as i started to type this another thought entered my mind;
perhaps this public reaction is a sign of something else as well. people don't seem to get super worked up about species lost, war, death all the horrifying things any more, which is sad, but it also is what it is. and then a person dies, and emotion pours out from across the world. in my eyes, the key focus here is about a person, for thats all that michael is/was. perhaps this shows another piece of the puzzle as well, that maybe we as a people, species, or even beyond, are returning to a deep care for what happens to each other (which many of us have not shared for some time now). i'm a pretty big believer in collective unconscious, and that we all have much more in common at any given time beneath the surface than we think, and if i'm feeling this way i'm sure others are as well. the healing power of shared grief plays a part here, i think
these thoughts are still pretty raw, and i dont know if i was able to convey them well. so please, i'd like to here what you think of this
alex
About
Latest Activity
I don't quite know where to put this but wanted to offer it for discussion.
There's interesting Frontline video [Oct 27, 2009] available at: http://www.grabtheapple.com/ regarding the economy/jobs and how people (in this instance in New York) are...
I don't quite know where to put this but wanted to offer it for discussion.
There's interesting Frontline video [Oct 27, 2009] available at: http://www.grabtheapple.com/ regarding the economy/jobs and how people (in this instance in New York) are...
There's interesting Frontline video [Oct 27, 2009] available at: http://www.grabtheapple.com/ regarding the economy/jobs and how people (in this instance in New York) are coping with the CRASH we're in, that we're living right now. The blog post i...
Power of Community / Transition W/A/B Meeting at Crescent Grange
December 8, 2009 from 7pm to 9pm
Come one Come all. Power of Community - The Story of How Cuba Survived Peak Oil, 53 minutes.
When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1990, Cuba's economy went into a tailspin. With imports of oil cut by more than half – and food by 80 percent – people ...
Nushin, all your ideas are great. I appreciate your initiative. Although I don't have answers to your questions, I encourage you to pick the ones you are passionate about and follow the path where it leads you. We will all be the better for it.
Th...
Sorry for the short notice, but if any of you are free tomorrow (today actually), the MoveOn Denver Council is meeting to start formulating a charter. We've found that the national organization's ambitions do not precisely match the local Council'...
Fellow Transitioners,
I am curious. What do you think about bike commuting? What should we be focusing on to make bike commuting a better option for all of us?
I've put together a quick (just ten questions!) survey to find out what you think. Pl...
Awakening the Dreamer - Changing the Dream Symposium at Crescent Grange in Broomfield
December 6, 2009 from 3pm to 7pm
At the heart of the initiative is the Awakening the Dreamer Changing the Dream Symposium.
Through dynamic group interactions, leading edge information, and inspiring multimedia, participants of this half-day event are inspired to reconnect with t...
Transition Denver Potlucks Continue! Nov. 30 at 700 Kalamath at The lovely building at the northeast corner of 7th and Kalamath
November 30, 2009 from 6pm to 9pm
Our ZERO WASTE potlucks continue.....bring something yummy to drink and/or eat, and your own plate, silverware, napkin.
This potluck will be hosted by our newest Transition Denver initiating committee member, Michele Hart. She works for the Redire...
The MoveOn Denver Council is a non-partisan group of Denver progressive activists affiliated with the MoveOn national organization. We are focused on civil actions that cultivate a vital progressive community engaged in civil affairs.
Badge
Facing challenges of peak oil, climate change and zero waste
Videos
Photos
Music
News from EnergyBulletin.net
© 2009 Created by Les Squires on Ning. Create Your Own Social Network
You need to be a member of Transition Colorado to add comments!
Join this social network